Volume 18, Issue 64 (Winter 2014)                   __Judicial Law Views __2012__, 18(__59__): __2240 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Izadifard A A, Jafarnia Osboee J O. Litigating from depositary against violent. دیدگاه‌های حقوقی. 2014; 18 (64)
URL: http://jlviews.ir/article-1-360-en.html
1- Professor of Private Law Mazandaran University , Ali85akbar@yahoo.com
2- M.A in Private Law Azad University, Branch of North Tehran
Abstract:   (8677 Views)

  undoubtedly one of the most important trustworthy obligations is restoration of deposit, and trustworthy is obliged to restoration it as soon as expiration of time or to ask depositor or forcible dissolution of trust contract and it’s sanction is changing trust possession to responsibility possession .

  sometimes is taken deposit by force form depository ,so legislator allow him to litigate against usurper and retake whatever lost and yet depositor is free to accept or reject what depository receive from usurper.

  In this essay we investigate the job that depository through its can to litigate against usurper and also consider discussions about it. The synopsis of research is: 1-the trustworthy has legal representation in litigation and depositor referral to usurper is possible if the received compensation by depository being disagree with depositor rights In terms of kind (Fungible or Qyym) or amount (provided it be less than damage) or stuff (more Inferior than what depredated) 2- trustworthy possession against usurper than what received is trust and kind of commitment to the result.

     
Type of Study: Revision & Collection | Subject: Pivate Law
Received: 2014/05/25 | Accepted: 2014/05/25

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

Send email to the article author


© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Judicial Law Views Quarterly

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb